[BUGS] Much ado about Sendmail

Jerahmy Pocott quakenet1 at optusnet.com.au
Thu Jan 10 15:52:58 EST 2008


On 09/01/2008, at 10:10 AM, jonathan michaels wrote:

>> I generally change the name of root in the passwd data base to
>> reflect what server it is, rather than 'charlie root'..
>
> actually this is avery good idea, it makes sence (ok to me) on teh  
> surface
>
>> But in this case I need to use masquerading for the server to
>> accept mail from the box,
>
> and this is where it starts to get messy/hairy/strange fro me,
> either i have missd teh point completely or you are doing
> something completely strange that i cannot fathom, because on
> my system(s) i change the root: alias to me, call me a
> narcissist.
>
>> so either the system mail needs to NOT come from root or root
>> needs to get its address masqueraded, assuming that doesn't
>> break internal stuff..
>
> why does it "need" to be so ?? and /or what sort of 'system
> mail' reporting are you talking about ?? because the basic
> maintenace stuff taken care of by the root crontab
> 'maintenance' stuff done over night, i call mine midnight
> maintenance, in memory of a bygone age of mail/news transport
> philosophies, as a homage if you will.
>
> on my v6.2 based (as well as teh lone v2,2,5) hosts all teh
> maintenance "mail" gets converted to j,,,mi.. as per teh root:
> alias, now this all comes to the at caamor dot com dot au
> aliased address and my mua then sorts it via the way that mutt
> as avaliable .. i choose Subject: as teh subject: has the
> machine name from which teh report has come .. relatively
> simple .. now as regards those fancy gui mua i don't have a
> clue as i am only starting with evolution and i don't hardly
> use it as it just takes tooooo much horsepower to run.
>
> if tehat teh mail you are talking about it not a real
> issue/problem, i don't think ?

Yes, just talking about the general crontab stuff plus a few
extra scripts I have it run for backups etc..

If I make it masquerade root then all the mails from any
machine in that domain are root at domain, but the name
of the sender is different for each machine because I
changed roots name and the subject line contains the
machine name.. So I'm not seeing any issue with doing
this even though the documentation seems to suggest
it's bad..




More information about the BUGS mailing list