[BUGS] Much ado about Sendmail
Jerahmy Pocott
quakenet1 at optusnet.com.au
Tue Jan 8 22:03:55 EST 2008
On 08/01/2008, at 9:53 PM, Trevor Roydhouse wrote:
> Jerahmy Pocott wrote:
>
>> Firstly WHY is root an example of a user that needs to be exposed?
>
> Because root in not unique across systems, so the internal system name
> is "exposed" rather than some common domain name?
>
>> This behavior breaks cron and system logs getting mailed to me, as
>> exposing root makes the mail server reject the message.. So is there
>> anything bad about having root get masqueraded? Is there a better
>> alternative?
>
> I simply add my email to the root alias in the mail aliases file :)
As do I..
But the system still sends mail to roots alias AS root, which means it
doesn't get masqueraded and thus is rejected by the mail server
because root at somebox.somedomain.com doesn't exist as far as the server
is concerned, however root at somedomain.com it would be perfectly happy
to accept..
More information about the BUGS
mailing list