[BUGS] Much ado about Sendmail

Jerahmy Pocott quakenet1 at optusnet.com.au
Tue Jan 8 22:03:55 EST 2008


On 08/01/2008, at 9:53 PM, Trevor Roydhouse wrote:

> Jerahmy Pocott wrote:
>
>> Firstly WHY is root an example of a user that needs to be exposed?
>
> Because root in not unique across systems, so the internal system name
> is "exposed" rather than some common domain name?
>
>> This behavior breaks cron and system logs getting mailed to me, as
>> exposing root makes the mail server reject the message.. So is there
>> anything bad about having root get masqueraded? Is there a better
>> alternative?
>
> I simply add my email to the root alias in the mail aliases file :)

As do I..

But the system still sends mail to roots alias AS root, which means it  
doesn't get masqueraded and thus is rejected by the mail server  
because root at somebox.somedomain.com doesn't exist as far as the server  
is concerned, however root at somedomain.com it would be perfectly happy  
to accept..


More information about the BUGS mailing list